# Integrations: POS, Forecourt & Processor Paths | RankShield Financial

> How RankShield Financial integrates beside the systems merchants already run — fuel POS, back office, and payment processors. Feeds-only, observe-first, fail-safe by construction.
>
> Source: https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/ · RankShield Financial (verifiable pre-settlement payment security)

Integrations
# It plugs in beside the stack you already run. RankShield Financial integrates through data feeds your systems already produce — POS journals, back-office exports, processor authorization detail — never through software on your registers or a position in your payment path. Observe mode first, enforcement when your own data earns it, and **fail-safe by construction**: if RankShield is unavailable, payments flow.
  Request a pilot  Browse by industry      The doctrine, on every page    Feeds only  journals + processor reporting    Observe first  accuracy proven on your data    Fail-safe  we are never in the payment path    Verifiable  every verdict sealed, checkable           01  // fuel & convenience systems   Fuel & convenience systems
## The systems at the store

POS, site controllers, and back office — where journal-level fraud signals live.

### Gilbarco Passport
 integration path
How RankShield Financial reads fraud signals from a Gilbarco Passport site — journal feeds and processor authorization detail, observe-first, with no pump or POS hardware changes. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/gilbarco-passport/)

### Verifone Commander
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds store-level fraud detection to Verifone Commander sites — journal and processor feeds, observe-first, no changes to the site controller or EPS. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/verifone-commander/)

### NCR Voyix
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds store-level fraud detection beside an NCR Voyix convenience-store POS — journal and processor authorization feeds, observe mode first, no POS changes. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/ncr-voyix/)

### PDI Enterprise
 integration path
For chains running PDI back-office software, one integration covers every store’s journal — the fastest Phase-1 path to fleet-wide fraud baselines with RankShield Financial. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/pdi-enterprise/)
        02  // processors & acquirers   Processors & acquirers
## The processors carrying the authorizations

Authorization detail and settlement reporting — where terminal-level card signals live, including the declines a store never sees.

### Fiserv
 integration path
How RankShield Financial uses the authorization detail and settlement reporting a Fiserv-processed merchant already receives to power store-level fraud detection, observe-first. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/fiserv/)

### Worldpay
 integration path
How RankShield Financial turns a Worldpay merchant’s authorization and settlement reporting into per-terminal fraud detection for stores and fuel sites, observe-first. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/worldpay/)

### Chase Payment Solutions
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds per-terminal fraud detection for merchants processing with Chase Payment Solutions — using merchant reporting feeds, observe-first, outside the payment path. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/chase-payment-solutions/)

### Elavon
 integration path
How RankShield Financial builds per-terminal fraud detection for Elavon-processed merchants in fuel, convenience, and hospitality — reporting feeds only, observe-first. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/elavon/)

### Global Payments / Heartland
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds store-level fraud detection for merchants on Global Payments and Heartland processing — convenience, fuel, and restaurant fleets, observe-first. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/global-payments-heartland/)

### Shift4
 integration path
How RankShield Financial pairs with Shift4’s API-forward processing platform to deliver store-level fraud detection for restaurants, hospitality, and convenience operators. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/shift4/)
        03  // smb pos & commerce platforms   SMB POS & commerce platforms
## The platforms running SMB checkout

Registers, online checkout, and commerce events — where card testing, refund abuse, and account takeover land on a small business.

### Square
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds store-level fraud detection beside Square — transaction and refund event feeds, per-location baselines, and a sealed receipt on every verdict. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/square/)

### Toast
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds fraud detection beside Toast — online-ordering card testing, refund and void chains per employee, gift-card scams — with sealed, verifiable verdicts. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/toast/)

### Clover
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds store-level fraud detection beside Clover POS — event feeds, per-location baselines, and sealed verdicts, pairing with the Fiserv processing path. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/clover/)

### Stripe
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds an independent verification and receipt layer beside Stripe — endpoint card-testing defense, refund anomalies, and sealed verdicts on every decision. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/stripe/)

### Shopify
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds independent fraud verdicts beside Shopify — checkout card testing, account takeover, refund abuse — with sealed receipts on every decision. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/shopify/)
        04  // ap & b2b payment platforms   AP & B2B payment platforms
## The platforms running accounts payable

Vendor masters, approval chains, and payment runs — where payee-swap fraud actually executes, and where verification before the money moves belongs.

### Bill.com
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds independent payee verification beside Bill.com — vendor banking-change holds, first-payment checks, and a sealed receipt on every payment verdict. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/bill-com/)

### QuickBooks
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds payee verification beside QuickBooks — vendor banking-change holds and first-payment checks for the small businesses fraud actually targets. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/quickbooks/)

### NetSuite
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds independent payee verification beside Oracle NetSuite — vendor-master change holds, payment-run screening, and sealed receipts for mid-market finance teams. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/netsuite/)

### Sage Intacct
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds independent payee verification beside Sage Intacct — vendor change holds, payment screening, and sealed receipts for finance teams and outsourced-AP firms. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/sage-intacct/)

### Ramp
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds independent payee verification beside Ramp — vendor banking-change holds and sealed receipts, integrated through an API-first spend platform. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/ramp/)

### Melio
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds independent payee verification beside Melio bill pay — banking-change holds and first-payment checks for small businesses and their accountants. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/melio/)

### Tipalti
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds an independent verification and receipt layer beside Tipalti mass-payables — supplier-change scoring and sealed verdicts across global payout runs. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/tipalti/)

### AvidXchange
 integration path
How RankShield Financial adds independent payee verification beside AvidXchange — vendor-change holds and sealed receipts for the real-estate, construction, and mid-market AP it serves. [See the path](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/integrations/avidxchange/)
        Independence, stated plainly
## Named systems, no implied partnerships

Every system on these pages is named so operators can answer one practical question: does RankShield work beside what we already run? RankShield Financial is not affiliated with, certified by, or endorsed by any vendor named here. Each integration consumes data the merchant owns and directs. That precision is the product: a platform whose entire promise is [verifiable claims](https://rankshieldfinancial.com/verifiable-attestation/) does not get to be casual about its own.
      FAQ
## Integration architecture, answered

Every question buyers ask before they trust a payment-security platform, answered directly.
           JAMIE KLONCZ · RANKSHIELD FINANCIAL           ONLINE
Pick a question on the left, or search above. You will get the direct answer, the way an answer engine would give it.
      REQUEST ACCESS →             Verify, then settle
## Tell us your stack. We’ll map the feeds.

Phase 0 is a short discovery: which POS, which back office, which processor. Phase 1 is a findings report on your own historical data — before anything touches production.
  Request a pilot  How it works

## Frequently asked questions

### What does a RankShield integration actually consist of?

Two data feeds and a mapping, in almost every deployment. First, the transaction journal your POS back office already exports — sales, refunds, voids, cashier and shift identifiers. Second, the authorization detail your payment processor already reports — terminal identity, amounts, timestamps, approval or decline, and how the card was read. Third, a one-time mapping of terminal IDs to stores and positions so the scoring runs per pump and per register rather than per merchant account. Nothing is installed on store systems, and the payment path is never modified, proxied, or placed behind our infrastructure.

### Why feeds instead of software on the POS or terminal?

Because store payment stacks are certified, hardened, and heterogeneous — and a fraud layer that demands per-vendor agents on every register does not survive a real fleet with mixed systems and acquisitions. The feeds-first architecture has three properties we consider non-negotiable: it deploys without store visits, it works identically across POS vendors so a mixed estate lands in one fleet view, and it makes the fail-safe structural — if RankShield is unavailable, payments flow, because we were never in the way. The trade-off is stated honestly on every page: we respond in near-real-time through operational controls, not by declining authorizations in-flight.

### Are these certified partnerships with the named vendors?

No, and every page says so explicitly. The systems named here — POS platforms, back-office software, payment processors — are named because operators reasonably ask whether RankShield works with what they already run, and an honest answer requires naming names. RankShield Financial is independent: not affiliated with, certified by, or endorsed by any vendor on these pages. The integrations consume data the merchant owns and directs. Where a deeper, vendor-side integration would serve a deployment, that conversation happens openly with all parties — it is never implied on a webpage first.

### Which integration should we start with?

The one with the most leverage, which is usually the back office or the processor rather than the stores. A chain whose sites roll up to a fleet back-office platform can cover every store’s journal with one connection, and a single processor relationship covers the authorization side for every terminal it acquires. That is why Phase 1 — the historical findings report — typically needs no store involvement at all: sixty to ninety days of data from those two sources is enough to show what the rules would have caught, store by store, before anything goes live.
